https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126242
V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://bz.apache.org/ooo/s
| |how_bug.cgi?id=43029
CC| |[email protected],
| |[email protected],
| |[email protected],
| |[email protected]
Version|6.2.4.2 release |Inherited From OOo
--- Comment #7 from V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> ---
This is a dupe of bug 99114 or bug 105979 where in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105979#c12 Khaled notes
"our subsetter does not support producing CFF fonts" and we get difference
between PDF generated by gs printing (embedding CFF font) and our PDF export
(embedding PS Type1 font).
Per 105979 this is inherited from OOo where Herbert Dürr (who implmented the
CFF -> PS Type1 subsetting) comments in
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=43029#c88
Caolán's https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/47607/ for bug 114704 looks to not
have fully resolved issue of bug 105979 but maybe on the right track
Guess the question might be if now, 10 years on, we can fully move to CFF and
drop the Type1 subsetting altogether?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
