https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32362
--- Comment #46 from V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Wolfgang Jäger from comment #44)
> (In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #32 of 2016-01-13)
> > It was correct in-between, so it is not the old bug. ...
>
> What version(s) did it correctly? May the quoted statement have been an
> error?
>
See comment 30 and bug 97111, after that back to staus quo inherited from OOo--
with some intervening improvements to accuracy of fitting the stretched
bracketing glyphs into their node bounds.
> Will the issue be addressed one day?
Possibly, and you get notice of it here.
>
> Despite the fact that there isn't much mention of the 'Math' component in
> forums I would assume that afflicted users (teachers e.g.) might be relevant
> "agents" concerning the standing of free and open software.
And? Teachers also are welcome to contribute source (as Regina does regularly)
;-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
