https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128266
Xisco Faulí <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |NOTOURBUG
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #7 from Xisco Faulí <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #6)
> (In reply to Gerry Garvey from comment #5)
> > I think the choice should be between having a valid value from the document
> > properties or not include the %%Title: field at all.
>
> Why? The EPS File Format v3.0 compliant as is with the "recommended"
> Comments hard-coded. Some over zealous validation tools would likely
> complain if there is no entry.
>
> The useful comment of %%Creator is populated with the generator details.
>
> The "%%Title: None", "%%CreationDate: None", "%%Pages: 0" comments can be
> directly edited in any text editor for those rare users that might need to
> see the comments in some external application--no significance to
> LibreOffice.
Closing as RESOLVED NOTOURBUG
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
