https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652
--- Comment #15 from Roman Eisele <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #5) > Jan_J (bug 49674 comment 2) proposed to use the Unicode word joiner U+2060 > with a normal space to get a non-fixed-width non-breakable space. But U+2060 > is a zero width non-breaking space inhibiting line breaks at both sides > which is "intended for disambiguation of functions for byte order mark" > (Unicode 6.2). That does not sound like a good candidate for such a space > (and one would need the triple U+2060 + U+0020 + U+2060, wouldn't one?). For Jan_J’s request (and related problems of the line-breaking algorithm), there is now bug 57652 - “Wrong treatment of Word Joiner (U+2060) in line breaking algorithm”. However, I think that one solution does not necessarily invalidate the other. I.e., when the bug 57652 would get fixed, and WJ + SP (+ WJ) would act like an elastic NBSP, we could still discuss if the behaviour of U+00A0 should be changed, too (or better: if an option to choose the behaviour of U+00A0, elastic or fixed, should be added). So the present bug report is still a valid enhancement request and essentially independend from bug 57652. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
