https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130133
--- Comment #6 from Michael Stahl (CIB) <michael.st...@cib.de> ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #4)
> The patch does not solve the problem entirely.
>
> We would need for writing:
> ODF 1.2 strict: do not write it at all ==> Done with the patch
> ODF 1.2 extended: write it in 'loext' namespace ==> ??
> ODF 1.3 strict and extended: write it in 'style' namespace ==> Nothing to do
>
> In case 'loext' is written, we would need to make all active LO versions
> able to read it in loext namespace.
yes, that's a bit of a problem, we'd have to first add the ability to read the
loext attribute and then wait a few years until most users have upgraded and
then we can write it.
apparently these values are written since 2013 if not earlier.
> @Michael: What do you think about the case "ODF 1.2 extended", which now
> still produces invalid files?
given that we need to wait anyway, my question is: in a couple of years, who
wants to export ODF 1.2 extended, i'd expect the default to be ODF 1.3 extended
then, which already solves the problem... so given the timing i'm not sure if
it's worth the effort to start doing anything about 1.2 extended now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
