https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127113
--- Comment #3 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Sarper Akdemir from comment #2)
The idea is that when all values are explicitly set, they all should be taken
into account, of course; i.e., when there's an end value, it limits the
sequence (and no element of resulting sequence is not greater than end value,
as already correctly implemented). But when any value is missing, it may be
easily calculated from the other two plus selection size.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
