https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116079
--- Comment #18 from Julien Nabet <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #16)
> (In reply to Noel Grandin from comment #13)
> > If Julien is correct in comment#10, then that is technically not a
> > well-formed XML document.
>
> Just removing meta.xml from the document makes it open OK.
> And yes, having no elements in the XML after prolog (here consisting of
> declaration) makes the XML not well-formed [1].
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/#sec-well-formed
Indeed.
In this case, perhaps should we change the patch to replace the return part by
a SAL_WARN ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
