https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131524
Oliver Brinzing <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
See Also| |https://bugs.documentfounda
| |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11
| |7715
CC| |[email protected]
Blocks| |87351
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Oliver Brinzing <[email protected]> ---
reproducible with:
Version: 6.3.5.2 (x64)
Build-ID: dd0751754f11728f69b42ee2af66670068624673
CPU-Threads: 4; BS: Windows 10.0; UI-Render: Standard; VCL: win;
Gebietsschema: de-DE (de_DE); UI-Sprache: de-DE
Calc:
but *not* reproducible with:
Version: 6.2.8.2 (x64)
Build-ID: f82ddfca21ebc1e222a662a32b25c0c9d20169ee
CPU-Threads: 4; BS: Windows 10.0; UI-Render: Standard; VCL: win;
Gebietsschema: de-DE (de_DE); UI-Sprache: de-DE
Calc:
setting to "NEW" but I think, this issue is a duplicate of:
Bug 117715 - Settings from Conditional formatting should overwrite direct
formatting
cause cell F3 has a hard cell number format: DD.MM.YY
and conditional format:
apply cell style "zapłacone" if $I3=0
-> number format: [$£-809]#.##0,00;-[$£-809]#.##0,00
-> background: green
with $I3=0
LO 6.2.8.2: green background and DD.MM.YY
LO 6.3.5.2: green background and £
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117715#c12
> So the only solution for consistency seems to be to effectively
> revert the fix for 93300 and have all conditional formatting take precedence.
> This might be what the majority expects
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87351
[Bug 87351] [META] Conditional formatting bugs and enhancements
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
