https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128507
--- Comment #3 from Tor Lillqvist <t...@iki.fi> ---
Suggested fix in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/online/+/92259 .
I wonder, should we add some logic to use larger zoom steps further away from
100% ?
Now each step is always pow(2,1/4) (1.1892), i.e. four steps are required to
double or halve the zoom. That fits reasonably well into what one would expect
between 35% and 200%, but to have four steps also from 200% to 400% (235%,
280%, 335%, 400%) is perhaps excessive.
Also, the convention of rounding the zoom to the closest five percent should
perhaps be changed above 200% to be the closest 10 or even 20 percent? Perhaps
the amount of rounding should also be exponential? (We already use 150% as the
label for what is actually 1.4142. I guess this is because 150% is a naïve
user's expectation that "150% is half between 100% and 200%".)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
