https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107779
--- Comment #14 from Luca <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to b. from comment #13)
> it holds with not checking the option 'update references' and including the
> empty colum E in the range to be sorted ...
Yes, it's alreade been told in comment #2. That's exactly why it should happen
as well with the option 'update references' checked.
It must be understood that any uncommon behaviour that breaks the integrity of
rows is *dangerous*, it causes loss of data! All the more when the uncommon
behaviour (in this case, a silent reduction of the area selected by the user)
gets applied only in some specific situation and not all the similar ones, by
the same application. This is worst than bad design: it's intentional sneaky
sabotage of user's intentions.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
