https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133131
Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #3 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #2)
To clarify: trying to lower memory consumption is a great things itself. If we
can change memory requirememns, e.g. using more efficient structures etc, that
would be most welcome.
However, the specific issue was not filed against *too much memory was required
for a specific task*; it was about the *timing* how the memory was freed after
initial allocation and closing the data. This aspect should not be generally
considered a bug, unless there is a substantial evidence that it causes real
problems. Of course, if memory is not freed at all, that should be considered a
bug, though; again, I say about dynamics here, when it *is* released, but not
at the moment when you expected, which means it is handled correctly, but using
a strategy different from your expectations.
I hope it makes my response clearer. Sorry if I wasn't specific enough.
Closing NOTABUG for the time being; of course feel free to reopen in the event
that you see a real problem caused by the behaviour you reported. Thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
