https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133459
--- Comment #11 from Wolfgang Jäger <j...@psilosoph.de> ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #6)
> Created attachment 161573 [details]
> number style in <office:styles>
>
> I don't think, that the mentioned commit is the whole problem. But it might
> have uncovered the underlying cause.
>
> If the <number:date-style> is in <office:styles> and not in
> <office:automatic-styles>, then the field in the header does not find the
> style. That problem is inherit from OOo.
>
> But because it is a user-defined date style, I think, that <office:styles>
> is the correct place for it.
Based on just a faint hope to understand better:
In what way should the bug's "underlying cause" have been covered by versions
where it was present in but did not become manifest?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
