https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126256
Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #20 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> ---
The attached PDF (unfortunately, hybrid one -> opens as Writer document) still
allows to see the resulting problem, which is definitely a substitution
problem.
If you open the PDF in a viewer (I wish I could open it in Draw!), copy the
text, and paste into Writer, you will be able to inspect the fonts of the
characters - and then it's obvious that the first line (the top border of the
table) is a mix of Calibri-Light (proportional-width font!) and Consolas; the
second line (with the column titles) consists of OpenSymbol and Cubiculum (it
shows its name even if you don't have the font, like myself); the third is
Consolas...
So the problem is that LibreOffice mot only does not take monospace font
character width into account when searching for substitutes - it even doesn't
give a monospace substitution: it's clear that the system has necessary
monospace fonts, but the resulting substitution may well be a proportional font
like Calibri or OpenSymbol.
For the test, you may use Noto Mono instead of Cubiculum.
Setting to NEW.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
