https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54520
--- Comment #3 from A <[email protected]> --- reproducible with LO 3.6.4.3. (Win7 Home, 64bit) But I think the footnote should not belong to the header, otherwise you would need maybe this footnote also on further pages if the reference text is for instance moved to the next page. But if you try this in the test document then you will find no footnote on the next page, although you would actually need it in this case. Therefore, I think the footnote should not belong to the header, but if it should also be mentioned in the reference then it should be superscript and the footnote should also be copied to the page of the reference. But I personally would rather say that the footnote should not belong to the header. When I tested the test document, then it seemed not be possible to format the footnote not as a header. In addition, I recognised that if I format the header as a normal text body, then the reference will nevertheless be kept and this seems to my mind not to be consistent. I think this issue needs to be evaluated further and the procedure needs improvements. Maybe somebody else can help with this issue? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
