https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134583
Telesto <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|regression |
--- Comment #9 from Telesto <[email protected]> ---
@Off-topic
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #7)
> I don't see how a gallery element created using a pre-aplha LibreOffice with
> unfinished feature implementation, where author obviously played with the
> feature, may be considered a regression.
DEVS tend to react as stung by a wasp if it comes to the regression keyword I
noticed. Even starting arguments on that with QA :-). Simply remove the
regression keyword if not applicable or change it implementation error might to
the trick Developers are better equipped to make that assessment. Of course
some motivation would be nice..
There should ideally be to types of regressions.. From user perspective & from
DEV perspective. A functionality regression even if technically not a
regression is still a regression in some way, IMHO
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
