https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135871
--- Comment #16 from Telesto <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #13)
they are *not* styles as they designed to be.
FWIW: it's partly about what they design; what's being practical. Of course
there need to be a model/a design. But if the design results something less
workable, move to being pragmatical. Exceptions on the rule.
I do see issues to Luke proposal. Same look on screen (font/bold/underline)
based on two different styles.. So merging DF to a style is not directly
possible. Which one to pick. Something else is doing a suggestion.. This DF
formatting matches styles XYZ. Adjust too.
Not saying this technically possible dev point of view; or ideal from user
point of view. Of UX agrees.. But I do understand what Luke is saying.. Even
though I'm more issues with they UI (PS/CS shown in a DF toolbar). And no way
to disable DF.
But other dimension/side of current model is indeed the harmonizing with styles
part. The to paradigms need to grow to each other; not be implemented as mutual
exclusive; as this isn't in line with daily reality. Or I assume it isn't.
I can only give my personal view on this. And even if the participation stuff
is going the fly (Board mailing list). I still believe we would have a hard
time structuring the discussion. As there plenty of ways to optimize/ adjust/
tweak. Say: remove formatting in at Style Inspector level. It's something.. And
surely better compared to nothing. But would be wipe for bleeding (Dutch
expression; not sure what the native equivalent is)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
