https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136433
--- Comment #4 from Telesto <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2)
> Yes, this enhancement would make it more clear. However, the CS is first of
> all a style independently from the actual PS. You can, for example, also
> edit a CS that is not yet applied. That's also why CS has no WYSIWYG font
> when preview is on (unlike PS). So it's likely a WF: CS has no hierarchy,
> and no parent until it is used.
Which would mean a new (place holder 'font') called inherited ;-). They CS
style obviously not show any 'font'; as which font it is depends on PS. Except
if the CS style defines a specific font (overriding the PS).
Currently CS style look show up as if they are overriding PS styles, which
isn't the case.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
