https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136434
--- Comment #6 from Christian Lehmann <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #4)
> Not a UX topic; and while purge/clean/streamline sounds nice I'm sceptical
> that it's easy to implement. There are just too many dependencies that
> require expert knowledge in order to make a decision whether a setting
> should remain or not.
I'm pursuing and urging this because I'm trying to do serious work with LO, but
it is unable to handle reliably the large file that I have submitted with other
bug reports. This file weighs 18.8 MB in FODT format, but 1.6 MB when exported
into DOCX format. This alone should alert developers about the inflated file
size. I have no doubt that the task of correcting a basic design mistake - in
this case, obnoxious redundancy in file structure - is deterrent. However, we
want to stand the competition with MS Office, don't we? Then it is not a real
help to classify the bug as 'not a UX topic' and to discourage people from
tackling the task.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
