https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137493
--- Comment #7 from Ming Hua <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #6)
> (In reply to Uwe Auer from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #3)
> > > So i gave you a 5 seconds way to reproduce it and instead of you trying to
> > > reproduce it yourself i have to install a daily build from some weird to
> > > install format?
> > >
> > > I'll pass
> >
> > Last comment from Min Hua doesn't state that he couldn't reproduce (or
> > anyone else couldn't) but that your report is accepted and most probably has
> > been reported already by some other people. The link and advice given, just
> > provides a way how you could check if the fix, that has been provided by
> > resolution of https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137248
> > also works for your. But you decided to pass ...
>
> That's not how i read his/her comment.
>
> The bug was set to "needsinfo" which in every other bug tracker i've used
> means "you need to give us this info, we'll wait until you do so before
> continuing to investigate this bug".
Sorry for making you feel this way. Yes I could test on 7.0.1/7.0.2/master
using your sample document and decide if it's a duplicate without your further
input, but I don't have a recent daily build installed and it would definitely
not be "5 seconds" work.
As Uwe Auer said we are all volunteers helping LO in our free time. I don't
want to give you a negative impression about LO community, but hope you can
understand that we have limited time and sometimes expect bug reporters to do a
bit of extra work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
