https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136929
Telesto <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|NEEDINFO |UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #7 from Telesto <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Timur from comment #6)
> I asked Telesto few times, upon seeing they are not well described, not to
> set bibisectRequest in unconfirmed bugs, and again.
-> I didn't at first, next it requested (back in they day: Xisc0), now I
supposed to refrain..
> First, when setting bibisectRequest it should be clear in which version
> regression came, so to know which repo to choose. Here, not clear.
-> Comment 2 for the range.
> When reporting a bug, it's bad practice to just upload large file, there
> should be a minimal size sample.
> But here, there's no simple bug, nor is it as described "Large footer". It's
> text box in footer.
-> It's text box (or specific text frame + image (called shape24)
And it appears to be figure 21 on page 23 being all over the place
> But I don't see this ever fine, seen if not concentrated to footer but to
> image position. Sometimes it's double, sometimes in the footer.
-> Gibberish to me. Please rephrase. If conclusion is me being wrong and it
also broken in 6.2 please say so.
> I set Needinfo for minimal sample and history of changes, to see if this was
> ever fine and why image is wrong in DOCX.
-> I'm not a trim down specialist; I did trim it down already (from 250 pages)
And the last time I more I stopped working. The size is pretty manageable, even
for a bibisect.
They answer "why" you find out by bibisecting. Which actually still not
'answer' but only a pointer. And it was exported 'fine'; comment 2.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
