https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138996
Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
See Also| |https://bugs.documentfounda
| |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11
| |4929
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> ---
First of all, this is an invalid issue. Its question ("Are FLOSS doomed to be
buggy because famous closed sources software are (just for the sake of
compatibility)??") has nothing to do with problems that bug tracker is used
for.
Then, it is wrong when (emotionally) discussing *correct* behavior of
LibreOffice (and Excel). In "-4^2", the unary minus is not an operation, it is
*part of mathematical notation for negative numbers*, while in "0-4^2", the
minus is a binary operation that has its precedence relative to other math
operations. And no, it's wrong to think that three different things (minus as
part of negative number notation; minus as unary negation - as in -(2+5); and
minus as binary subtraction operation) have the same rules of application /
precedence. When used as part of negative number notation, it is considered
prior to *any* operation you might want to apply to the negative number.
It's a different thing that users sometimes don't know math well enough; there
is tdf#114929 that suggests automatic bracketing for this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
