https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139173
Julien Nabet <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|[email protected] |
--- Comment #5 from Julien Nabet <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to cameron.pinnegar from comment #4)
>...
> Well, LO Calc is mimicking Excel's limitations already. The bounds of the
> formulae seem to be so that the outputs are constrained to be 10 characters
> long, but that's just an arbitrary thing Microsoft chose. LibreOffice
> doesn't have to abide by that -- it could choose to allow much bigger
> inputs, yet it doesn't, for what I assume are compatibility reasons. So if
> compatibility and consistency are goals, the bounds should match Excel's.
So you prefer LO sticks to Excel limitations instead of LO being able to do
better just for compatibility sake?
It seems most people prefer Excel compatibility as a top priority for Calc, I
find it crazy. Anyway, don't worry, I must be the only one (at least never saw
another one) to think like this, so I suppose this "bug" will be "fixed" :-)
=> uncc myself
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
