https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140360
V Stuart Foote <vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |103459
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC| |libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
| |.freedesktop.org,
| |rayk...@gmail.com,
| |vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu
Ever confirmed|0 |1
See Also| |https://bugs.documentfounda
| |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13
| |1947
Keywords| |needsUXEval
--- Comment #1 from V Stuart Foote <vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu> ---
Not clear how much work this would require, but it is probably worth doing in
any case.
And, it would need to be consistent for all SB Decks, so I guess the action of
the control here would be that *all* Sidebar Decks would be reworked and
receive the "slide to collapse" of the original SB implementation.
Result as a counter to the default minimum, and minimum per deck (no hidden
controls), the new control allowing hiding and eventual collapse of decks would
be configured from expert configuration.
Personally I always preferred the original implementation that allowed the
decks to slide hiding controls before full collapse. We removed that feature in
setting a SB minimum width, and per deck minimum. This effectively would
restore that as a non-default option.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103459
[Bug 103459] [META] Sidebar UI and UX bugs and enhancements
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
