https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140476
--- Comment #8 from Telesto <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to mwtjunkmail from comment #7)
> It's not about being optimal, it's about choice. Do I want my 16GB library
> of PNG files to have the fastest load rate and least compression per image,
> or for each image to take longer to load because their compression rates are
> high? That's not a call anyone can make or should make for anyone else.
>
> Personally, I go middle of the road, and the default compression rate of 6
> in LO is fine for me.
PS. not for removal. However I find it confusing having exact the dialog layout
(slider concept) at the same position representing different things
For lossy compression formats the scale is sometimes label 'compression'
sometimes' quality. There is a 'relation' between file-size and quality. More
quality large file size
For lossless formats there is no 'quality' aspect involved. It's all about
compression. Which has more to do with processing speed
(compressing/decompressing).
Currently there are two file formats using the system. But well, maybe WEBP
joins the club
I still think there should a gui wise distinction between Compression and
Quality.. And the 'sliders' should show - as a label - the default value (as
reference) what's seen as 'default advised setting'.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
