https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108518
Justin L <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |[email protected]
Status|RESOLVED |NEW
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
--- Comment #11 from Justin L <[email protected]> ---
This one also has features similar to bug 68988. I think both of these
"duplicate" bugs have multiple problems. So let's keep this one out as a unique
bug report since it focuses on the italics problem (and the bold numbering of
bug 68988's attachment 85272).
I'm guessing the problem is in the addition of
//Ensure the default char fmt is initialized for any level of num ruler if
no customized attr
If I understand that right, he is saying that even if there was no formatting
specified, let's create a named character format for it. Well, if there was no
special formatting, why do we need a charstyle for it? And where is the
italic/bold information coming from that is being placed in this charstyle?
Just eliminating this section fixes this bug and causes no unit test failures
(but doesn't fix the main issues in the "duplicate" bugs). It also helps NOT
spamming the character styles.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
