https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57061
--- Comment #31 from Florian Reisinger <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #30) > I am sorry but this can't be taken as a blocker. Yes, it is annoying that > some setting is lost. Though, it does not affect the functionality of the > software. It is still well usable. > > Is it really a blocker when user lost the list of recently used documents or > few 3rd-party extensions that even might need an update to work with the new > release? Are these the most critical problems in this release? If you describe it like that no > > All linux users lost similar level of setting with the switch from LO-3.4 to > LO-3.5 and I am not aware of any strong complains. True > > BTW: I am very surprised by the sentence: > > --- cut --- > "If we expect, that something isn't working it should even not be called > Beta, it should be called Alpha or even Daily! > --- cut --- > > I am sorry but this is non-realistic. It would mean that we would not be > able to release next few years until we fix all bugs and regressions caused > by all fixes. You are very right at this point. But the problem is: We can't fix that later on ( or only for 5.0 which definitely is not in the very near future...) > Note that it would include implementing all missing features > for 100% import/export from/into the supported file formats to avoid any > potential "data loss". Unfortunately, the software would be very outdated in > compare with the competitors at this point. +1 > Please, read also https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#Summary. > The time based release means that .0 release is intended for enthusiasts. It > might include include even annoying bugs. Year I totally understand your point, but here my reason for this sharp sentence above (I didn't get it sound more friendly - sorry for that) > I am sorry if the above sounded too strong. It was just a reaction on the > previous quite strong comment. I wanted to emphasize that the situation is > not that easy and we have to see it from different point of views :-) Of course. And the most important aspect: You have more experience on how to release a program :-) But please read my rephrased argument ( it isn't sharp any more AND you were not too strong): If we didn't do it in 4.0 we have to do it with 5.0 [2016-2018 IMHO] --> We should do this ASAP with (if that is possible) 5.0 testing builds... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
