https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140719

Jan-Marek Glogowski <glo...@fbihome.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |NEEDINFO

--- Comment #10 from Jan-Marek Glogowski <glo...@fbihome.de> ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #7)
> Single Label: Prints a single label or business card on a page.
> 
> So far the current implementation is correct. But with col/row it's not a
> _single_ label anymore and I would expect to print the given number of
> labels. Hard to say if the implementation was done intentionally (making
> this an enhancement) or not (thus it's a bug, plus the caption is wrong).
> 
> Jmux, any stance here? Maybe it's easyhackable.

I have no idea about the correct behavior, like many other features in LO. But
I see the actual result described in comment 6 as correct:

> Actual result:
> Only one label

My interpretation of this feature / workflow:

1. Define your label format by
1.1 (Optional) Select the label type from the brand + type lists
1.2 (Optional) Set the "layout" in the Format tab
2. Select which single label you want to print (as in: which position AKA row +
column)
3. Create the document via 'New Document' button

Now you have a document with a single label / frame at the correct position on
the page. I can modify anything in the text frame and then print / MM the
document.

IMHO the user shouldn't be able to select any row + column for the "single
label", which is outside the range specified in the Format tab. At least I
don't see any sense in it, if you select "Format: Sheet". I have no idea yet,
how the "single label" option with "Format: Continuous" even makes sense.

Coming back to the original report, I can't reproduce;

> 4. in the new document, select the text & alter the font in any way & try to 
> print from the toolbar

Why should the label frame move? If it does, it's clearly a bug, but I can't
reproduce with master. The generated / MM document is correct.

So Scott, please describe exactly what you did in step four and attach the
saved label document, before you print it (AKA the MM input document), based on
the biblio default DB. And please update your LO to the current version.

So I'll set this bug to NEEDINFO. And please reset the bug to UNCONFIRMED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to