https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143114

Michael Weghorn <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           See Also|                            |https://bugs.documentfounda
                   |                            |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14
                   |                            |3334
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEEDINFO
                 CC|                            |[email protected]
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Michael Weghorn <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Armin Le Grand from comment #0)
> Errors seen (probably not complete list):
> To reproduce, open bugdoc (LO528_Filter+Tesla.ods), Use dropdown button at
> 1st field to open DropDown/PopUp then
> 
> (1) Problems with using TAB key, no crash, but main win makes EMPTY REPAINT
> and stays that way. Needs handish action to show UI && EditView again at all
> (e.g. resize)

This sounds like the same issue issue as bug 143114, which I encountered just
today. I just double-checked it's a regression from the same commit.

> (2) No error with clicking at object selection CheckBoxes, but action is on
> MouseDown instead of MouseUp, also on leaving CheckBox area with still
> pressed MouseButton -> not standard, even the other 'normal' buttons trigger
> on MouseUp (trigger on LeaveArea is BAD since often used by user to
> terminate unwanted data entry without change)

That behaves the same with gen VCL plugin and on Win, so might not be specific
to qt5/kf5, but an issue with the general VCL implementation (as opposed to
gtk3, which might use native controls)?

> (3) DropDown/PopUp stays open and in FG when changing app on Linux desktop
> (keyboard, ALT+TAB) -> very strange, unwanted effects -> e.g. gtk3_kde5
> avoids that by simply FORBIDDING app/focus change wile popup is open

Same with "gen" in my tests, while gtk3 behaves better.

Can we see (1) as a duplicate of bug 143114?
Are (2) and (3) the same thing or does it possibly make sense to open separate
bug reports for those? (unless you plan to fix them anyway ;-))

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to