https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134429

stragu <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]
                   |                            |.org
         Resolution|---                         |WORKSFORME
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #9 from stragu <[email protected]> ---
Tested on Ubuntu 18.04 with Budgie DE.

With gtk3: works fine. However, note that I had to turn off the setting
"Pointer Location" in Gnome Tweaks for it to work as expected.

With kf5: works fine as well, can't reproduce in recent master build:

Version: 7.3.0.0.alpha0+ / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: cd2b5168e8ef1cb6e721bc5220421464ed723096
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 4.15; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 (cairo+xcb)
Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US
TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@86-TDF, Branch:master, Time:
2021-07-21_14:56:23
Calc: threaded

But with 7.0.6, I can reproduce:

Version: 7.0.6.2
Build ID: 144abb84a525d8e30c9dbbefa69cbbf2d8d4ae3b
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 4.15; UI render: default; VCL: kf5
Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded

And with 7.2.0 RC1 as well:

Version: 7.2.0.1 / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 32efc3b7f3a71cfa6a7fa3f6c208333df48656cc
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 4.15; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 (cairo+xcb)
Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded

So marking this as WORKSFORME, given that it seems it was fixed after 7.2 RC1.

lvm, could you please confirm with the latest master build from this page?
https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/current.html
It should be Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@86-TDF (deb) for you.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to