https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143656
--- Comment #6 from Robert Großkopf <[email protected]> --- (In reply to m.a.riosv from comment #5) > I didn't find exactly, but should be possible to run the sql as direct in a > macro. > In https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/images/b/b0/BH5009-Macros.pdf, page > 71 shows how to enable direct sql for mail-merge. It's only mail merge and I haven't tested it works not the same way as SQL in macros will work. Mail merge needs to know here, if it should use a table directly (by tablename), a query directly (by name of the query) or SQL-code, which should be written separately instead of the name of a query, as I have written in the Base Handbook. Note: I have written most of the content of Base Handbook. Base Handbook is translated to English from the German Base Handbuch. When I have written all these I haven't detected there is a difference between direct SQL in a query (which is real direct) and SQL in macros and Tools → SQL. I thought all this will be the same - but it isn't. If there is a real good argument for the difference between real direct SQL in a query and SQL in macros and Tools → SQL I have to change the content of the (German) Handbook here. My opinion: The difference, which appears here, isn't intended. It is a buggy behavior. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
