https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125328
Timur <gti...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |bibisectRequest
--- Comment #22 from Timur <gti...@gmail.com> ---
Using 10 slides attachment 174187 (needs to be clear which one is printed) and
external print with default values including color:
LO 607 32-bit Win with Bullzip gives PDF 2,5 MB
LO 607 32-bit Win with PDFill gives PDF 7,4 MB
LO 616 32-bit Win with Bullzip gives PDF 3,1 MB
LO 616 32-bit Win with PDFill gives PDF 7,5 MB
LO 620 32-bit Win with Bullzip gives PDF 27,6 MB !!
LO 636 32-bit Win with Bullzip gives PDF 27,6 MB
LO 7.0.0 32-bit Win with Bullzip gives PDF 28,8 MB
LO 7.2.0 32-bit Win with Bullzip gives PDF 19,1 MB
LO 7.3+ 64-bit Win with Bullzip gives PDF 17,5 MB !
LO 7.3+ 64-bit Win with PDFill gives PDF 24,0 MB
MSO 2016 with Bullzip gives PDF 4,0 MB
MSO 2016 with PDFill gives PDF 3,8 MB
I don't have Microsoft Print to PDF, nor it should be only one tested, because
it's Win10 only. Obviously depends on PDF printer. Bullzip seems relevant.
Microsoft Print is most efficient with MSO.
Is it a regression we could argue, but worsening seems obvious from 6.2.0 with
these.
I set back bibisectRequest for someone who can do it in Windows.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
