https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143853
--- Comment #7 from Stephan Bergmann <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Timur from comment #6) > - Why oor:type="xs:int" must be used where setting in Expert Configuration > shows "long" as Type; There used to be <http://util.openoffice.org/common/configuration/oor-document-format.html> "OpenOffice.org Registry Format (OOR)" describing the registry format, but that has apparently been lost to history. I find what looks like a faithful copy of that document at <https://people.freedesktop.org/~vmiklos/2013/oor-document-format.html>, though. The registry uses the XML Schema xs:int type for 32-bit integers. The expert configuration presumably naively uses the name of the corresponding UNO type LONG instead. I think cleaning up the terminology used by the expert configuration to better match the XML Schema terminology (rather than the UNO terminology) might be worth an enhancement request. > - Is oor:type setting in OXT important? Can it be left out? Without actually looking into the code now, I /think/ it can be left out in the registry update format for properties that are not of type oor:any. > - Why RegistryModifications has no oor:type setting but it has oor:op="fuse"? I do not understand that unspecific "RegistryModifications has no oor:type setting" claim. For the meaning of oor:op="fuse", see the document mentioned above. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
