https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134203
--- Comment #9 from Buovjaga <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jan-Marek Glogowski from comment #8) > FYI: the bibisect commit was reverted to fix bug 141556 in > https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/ > 0fedac18214a6025401c4c426466a5166553e8ec%5E%21 > > I tried to find an alternative fix (dropping quite some code), but > everything I came up with resulted in broken layout: > https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/114105 > > Main problem is that I simply don't understand the condition, when it's > actually fine to break the layout, so it can be resumed correctly. 2nd > problem is, that the idle layout is currently stateless, but for my current > approach it would need some state to handle removing of pages. > > So I'm removing the bibisect* keywords; maybe it can be bibisected again > hoping for a better result. I don't see how it could be bibisected again as 0fedac18214a6025401c4c426466a5166553e8ec makes no difference to the result. Do you mean bibisecting earlier than 6.4? What would be the good/bad states? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
