https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134203
--- Comment #14 from Telesto <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jan-Marek Glogowski from comment #8) > Main problem is that I simply don't understand the condition, when it's > actually fine to break the layout, so it can be resumed correctly. 2nd > problem is, that the idle layout is currently stateless, but for my current > approach it would need some state to handle removing of pages. Is this not simply some layout issue, where table rendering keeps forcing a frame union. Which for some reason not 'passed' based on timing? I see this more as an uncovered table splitting bug. Where certain kind of frame union is tried, but failing (oscillating back and forward) without a bail-out (likely because embedded table in table) The bail-out obviously result in some layout change, but if it's the same prior 6.4, who cares? Layout loop seems more evil to me ;-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
