https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144128
Stephan Bergmann <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] |desktop.org | --- Comment #2 from Stephan Bergmann <[email protected]> --- Addressed with <https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/e529461bcb126e0975ffa3f86e1fd5a630551de2%5E%21> "Enable JVM also on macOS ARM64" on master towards LibreOffice 7.3. But note that this is known to work (and not crash the soffice process) only with specific JDKs: See <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2021-June/087539.html> "Re: Using Java on macOS ARM64" and the libera.chat #libreoffice-dev excerpt from June 29, 2021: > Jun 29 16:37:00 <loircbot> LibreOffice (core) sbergman · > jvmfwk/plugins/sunmajor/pluginlib/sunjre.cxx · Enable JVM also on macOS ARM64 > Jun 29 16:44:02 <cloph_away> sberg__: ^ any reasons that'd speak against > cherry-picking that for 7-2 branch as well? > Jun 29 16:44:57 <sberg__> cloph_away, do we even do ARM64 macOS builds? > Jun 29 16:45:18 <cloph_away> sberg__: unofficial/unsupported/not explicitly > listed on the dl-pages (at least for now) > Jun 29 16:46:42 <cloph_away> sberg__: native builds feel snappier, so might > even add them to the DL-page as an experimental option for 7.2 > Jun 29 16:46:47 <sberg__> cloph_away, and I'm not sure whether it's > really worth backporting, as other JDK versions still appear to crash LO (I > never understood what the issue is, whether it's a bug in the JVMs, or a bug > in macOS, or a bug in M1, or maybe for some odd reason even a bug in LO ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
