https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144598
Julien Nabet <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |heiko.tietze@documentfounda | |tion.org, | |[email protected], | |[email protected] --- Comment #5 from Julien Nabet <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #3) > (In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #1) > > Heh, I read there: > > > If there is other or even "UI Render: Skia/Raster" instead, it means the > > symptoms aren't caused by Skia, > > heh. It is *indeed* wrong. Just yesterday I helped a person over IRC who > needed the procedure I described in comment 2; and indeed, the problem *was* > caused by Skia, even though the problem was not using Vulkan (even the > Skia/Raster was preventing LibreOffice from launch). With your previous comment, well spotted! I think we need a quick and easy way to fix this for users instead of modifying registrymodifications. Heiko/Xisco/Luboš: Should we create a new entry like 'Disable Skia' or should we use "Disable hardware acceleration" to set "UseSkia" at False ? The second option should be straightforward since it only requires 1 extra line in BackupFileHelper::tryDisableHWAcceleration in comphelper/source/misc/backupfilehelper.cxx) (see https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/comphelper/source/misc/backupfilehelper.cxx?r=a1252364&mo=64108&fi=1892#1892) Luboš: I read in vcl/skia/README that "raster" was "CPU-based drawing (here primarily used for debugging)" So except debugging for devs, is it necessary to include "raster" Skia in release versions of LO? I mean, graphical part is dealt by GPUs or if no GPUs, by chipset included in motherboards so no use of CPU here too. So if we remove "raster" case, no need to change registrymodifications management here, it would be (at least for Windows) either Skia Vulkan or no Skia at all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
