https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144521
--- Comment #12 from [email protected] --- "... there *might* be complications when some cells are not declared..." Such as here, in content.xml of the "original-lift & v100+.ods" original file? PMABIHTP! <table:table-row table:style-name="ro1" table:number-rows-repeated="142"> <table:table-cell table:number-columns-repeated="5"/> <table:table-cell table:style-name="ce12"/> <table:table-cell table:number-columns-repeated="6"/> <table:table-cell table:style-name="ce9"/> <table:table-cell table:number-columns-repeated="2"/> <table:table-cell table:style-name="ce153"/> <table:table-cell table:style-name="ce11"/> <table:table-cell table:number-columns-repeated="47"/> </table:table-row> <table:table-row table:style-name="ro1" table:number-rows-repeated="1043575"> <table:table-cell table:number-columns-repeated="64"/> </table:table-row> <table:table-row table:style-name="ro2" table:number-rows-repeated="11"> <table:table-cell table:number-columns-repeated="64"/> </table:table-row> <table:table-row table:style-name="ro2"> <table:table-cell table:number-columns-repeated="64"/> </table:table-row> I think a repetition of more than a million empty rows might very well cause problems for other software! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
