https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132296
--- Comment #5 from Stephan Bergmann <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Marc-Oliver Straub from comment #4) > Not unrolling the typedef would be better since it will improve readability > of the calling code. > When using a method using a typedef, an engineer will most likely use the > typedef in code that calls such a method, resulting in better > self-explaining code: > > XLongTypedef result = methodReturningXTypedef() > instead of > sal_Int32 result = methodReturningXTypedef() But that's all independent of whether or not the typedef is unrolled in the cppumaker-generated files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
