https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145490
--- Comment #14 from Buovjaga <[email protected]> --- (In reply to xordevoreaux from comment #13) > (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #12) > > (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #11) > > > > Or maybe the antivirus vendor is smart enough to detect LibreOffice, > > recognizing the *released* versions like 7.2.2, not scaring users with the > > false positives; but indeed, it would not detect a debug daily build, and > > then clueless users that for some unknown reason using alpha-stage dailies > > would again blame something that don't understand. Or many other reasons ... > > and the aggression that some users show in their reports shows that not > > everyone can be reasonable. > > Doesn't explain why, for the dozens if not more daily dev downloads over the > years that I've volunteered my time to test to help out the Document > Foundation make LibreOffice a better product, that this was the first time > Bitdefender ever flagged a cut with a virus, and it's the first time that I > had ever tried to install that palette extension, also mentioned in this bug. It does explain it in a general way. Only the developers of Bitdefender could explain the specific "why". Closed-source heuristics are a black box to us. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
