https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96401
Kevin Suo <suokunl...@126.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://bugs.documentfounda
| |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76
| |115
CC| |suokunl...@126.com
--- Comment #17 from Kevin Suo <suokunl...@126.com> ---
1. The file uses backslashes as file name separator:
$ zipinfo /home/suokunlong/下载/tmp/failing_doc.docx
Archive: /home/suokunlong/下载/tmp/failing_doc.docx
Zip file size: 9547 bytes, number of entries: 13
-rw---- 2.0 fat 1576 b- defN 80-Jan-01 00:00 [Content_Types].xml
-rw---- 2.0 fat 685 b- defN 15-Dec-08 10:52 docProps\app.xml
-rw---- 2.0 fat 619 b- defN 15-Dec-08 10:52 docProps\core.xml
-rw---- 2.0 fat 4188 b- defN 15-Dec-08 10:52 word\document.xml
-rw---- 2.0 fat 971 b- defN 15-Dec-08 10:52 word\endnotes.xml
-rw---- 2.0 fat 1595 b- defN 80-Jan-01 00:00 word\fontTable.xml
-rw---- 2.0 fat 977 b- defN 15-Dec-08 10:52 word\footnotes.xml
-rw---- 2.0 fat 2440 b- defN 80-Jan-01 00:00 word\settings.xml
-rw---- 2.0 fat 16648 b- defN 80-Jan-01 00:00 word\styles.xml
-rw---- 2.0 fat 260 b- defN 80-Jan-01 00:00 word\webSettings.xml
-rw---- 2.0 fat 6999 b- defN 80-Jan-01 00:00 word\theme\theme1.xml
-rw---- 2.0 fat 1081 b- defN 80-Jan-01 00:00
word\_rels\document.xml.rels
-rw---- 2.0 fat 590 b- defN 80-Jan-01 00:00 _rels\.rels
13 files, 38629 bytes uncompressed, 8069 bytes compressed: 79.1%
2. Backslash is not allowed by PK ZIP Specs:
https://pkware.cachefly.net/webdocs/casestudies/APPNOTE.TXT
4.4.17 file name: (Variable)
4.4.17.1 The name of the file, with optional relative path.
The path stored MUST NOT contain a drive or
device letter, or a leading slash. All slashes
MUST be forward slashes '/' as opposed to
backwards slashes '\' for compatibility with Amiga
and UNIX file systems etc. If input came from standard
input, there is no file name field.
3. Actually a lot of third-party software still uses backslashes. See e.g. bug
76115 (which has a duplicate bug 131575).
This bug is for docx, bug 76115 is for xlsx. But I think they use the same
package/source/zippackage code. For bug triaging purpose, should this be marked
as a duplicate of bug 76115?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
