https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139304
Buovjaga <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA --- Comment #7 from Buovjaga <[email protected]> --- (In reply to MMM from comment #5) > "Please explain how I can experience the wait that is causing you problems." > > I don't know. I gave up, spending hours and hours to find a solution. > I'm not using scalc anymore; it was unworkable for me in the sheet I wanted > to make. The only difference I could see, was the number of cells you copied > it to. > > BTW: waiting 1 second is still 1 second to much, if you do such copying > often. In Excel, the wait is 0 seconds, doing the exact same. Ok, as you can't provide an example file we can't evaluate the performance. However, your original description sounded like there was a delay when filling only a 1000 cells, not 1048576. I don't have access to the latest Excel or any Excel on my main machine, but I now tested with Excel 2013 on a less performant machine and it took 2 seconds to fill down to A1048576. Calc is getting performance improvements all the time. The most recent significant one is autofilter, where testers reported it is now much faster than Excel for large data sets. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
