https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128279
--- Comment #5 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Justin L from comment #4) > So you are back to the suggestion about adding an option to keep the table > columns balanced. In general, I don't think that is necessary (unless ODF > already has a specification that a table should do this). Designing tables > is a user task, not a computer task. It is easy enough to re-balance the > table once the infrequent "design change" is finished. Let me try to suggest a "compromise suggestion", which may satisfy both @John's initial expectation and agree with what you (@JustinL) have written. I believe John was expecting a rebalancing of widths based on that fact that he had not explicitly set the width of any column, nor done anything else to countermand his initial expressed wish of equi-distributed columns. So, one could argue that, for the special case of columns whose last width setting was an equi-distribution, a deletion could be expected to equi-distribute among the remaining columns; but in any other situation, only the two surrounding columns would gain width as is the current behavior. I'm personally of two minds regarding what I would feel meets my expectations as a user. Anyway, rephrased the title to better express what John seems to ask for. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
