https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145730
--- Comment #7 from Daniel Hevron Pereh <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Daniel Hevron Pereh from comment #5) > (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #4) > > (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #3) > > > 1. Templates are made to be direction-sensitive and include > > > contents/settings for both directions, or > > > 2. Templates should be linked, with a direction change triggering a switch > > > to the linked template. > > > > > > > I would prefer to ship RTL variants of the templates. > > > > > > Does that mean you would support my second alternative? > > > > Don't get the "linked" argument. #1 means we care to make automatic > > switching possible (bound to slide properties > text direction) while #2 > > probably means to pick either <Candy>_LTR or <Candy>_RTL. > > > > I wouldn't do any automatic selection but pack different templates into the > > binary. It would be the duty of the l10n team to make sure RTL is covered > > properly. > > As an RTL power user. LO is confusing enough for the average user to > understand how to set it up for his locale. Could you believe that I didn’t > know, up until now, the slide property you mentioned? If we talk > accessibility- automatic selection is a better way to go. Most users just > want to open the software, choose a template and have it corrected to his > locale needs. Sorry for cluttering. I take that back. Actually the second option is better. Maybe not with duplicates with suffix but choosing a template and having a checkbox at the bottom of the dialog for “RTL version” -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
