https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145175
--- Comment #9 from Chris Sherlock <chris.sherloc...@gmail.com> --- Julien, I tested out your patch. It looks good. I respectfully disagree with the reviewer - a straight loop is fine for now. My only question is: why would "Office.Commands/Execute" be a problem? I have a utility that shows that "Setup/L10N" doesn't get cleared... Eval, if you want to improve upon the patch, why not fix it after the patch is committed. I can't see any reason why this is more or less readable than having to setup several lambdas for a custom built for_each_if() function! Which would be replaced with std::ranges in C++20. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
