https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116412
Julien Nabet <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected], | |[email protected], | |[email protected] | |, [email protected] --- Comment #9 from Julien Nabet <[email protected]> --- I could make "import bz2" work with these changes: diff --git a/external/python3/ExternalPackage_python3.mk b/external/python3/ExternalPackage_python3.mk index faddf06fc36a..cadb3bf3e9f8 100644 --- a/external/python3/ExternalPackage_python3.mk +++ b/external/python3/ExternalPackage_python3.mk @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ $(eval $(call gb_ExternalPackage_add_files,python3,$(LIBO_BIN_FOLDER)/python-cor LO_lib/_bisect.$(python3_EXTENSION_MODULE_SUFFIX).so \ LO_lib/_blake2.$(python3_EXTENSION_MODULE_SUFFIX).so \ LO_lib/cmath.$(python3_EXTENSION_MODULE_SUFFIX).so \ + LO_lib/_bz2.$(python3_EXTENSION_MODULE_SUFFIX).so \ LO_lib/_codecs_cn.$(python3_EXTENSION_MODULE_SUFFIX).so \ LO_lib/_codecs_hk.$(python3_EXTENSION_MODULE_SUFFIX).so \ LO_lib/_codecs_iso2022.$(python3_EXTENSION_MODULE_SUFFIX).so \ diff --git a/external/python3/UnpackedTarball_python3.mk b/external/python3/UnpackedTarball_python3.mk index 31b6a166e6ae..68490e2e9fee 100644 --- a/external/python3/UnpackedTarball_python3.mk +++ b/external/python3/UnpackedTarball_python3.mk @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ $(eval $(call gb_UnpackedTarball_add_patches,python3,\ external/python3/python-3.3.0-darwin.patch.1 \ external/python3/python-3.8-msvc-sdk.patch.1 \ external/python3/python-3.7.6-msvc-ssl.patch.1 \ - external/python3/python-3.5.4-msvc-disable.patch.1 \ external/python3/ubsan.patch.0 \ external/python3/python-3.5.tweak.strip.soabi.patch \ external/python3/darwin.patch.0 \ This last part disables the patch which disables (double negation so I should say "enables") a lot of libs from Python I suppose putting minimum allows to provide lighter packages but if Python is provided for macro scripting, I can understand the need of full Python, not just core of it. Also, if people have already installed Python, it's a pity we force to include it again in LO. => In brief, I don't have strong opinion about just putting minimum libs in Python embedded in LO. Perhaps the start would be what was the goal to include Python at the first time? macro scripting? LO QA tests in Python instead of Java? Other? If people could provide pros and cons or perhaps should it be discussed in ESC? Jan-Marek/Michael/David: any thoughts here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
