https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146928
--- Comment #9 from JO3EMC <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 178567 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=178567&action=edit Test Layout [Paragraph Style]-[Font] JO3EMC 20220216a After Comment 7, I had a long discussion with Heiko on the Telegram CJK channel on 2022-02-17. Thank you for that, @Heiko. In the discussion, Heiko emphasized the importance of reducing the height of the dialog. As in Bug 139395 Comment 10, he says it needs to fit in 600px according to HIG [1]. [1] Wiki Global "Design/Guidelines/PropertyDialog" https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Guidelines/PropertyDialog I feel that a 600px dialog size is an over-requirement for a 768px display size, but if that's the guideline's judgment, then it's unavoidable. It's still unconvincing to me that we're making changes to the "Font" tab page, which is a major detriment to our usability, before the other larger tab pages. I don't think the discussion on the layout proposal was held with enough time to gather the voices of CJK/CTL users. However, there is no objection to aiming to comply with the guidelines as a future issue. Under such circumstances, I was thinking about the 600px layout like an attached file. I think it's feasible with a layout like page 8 "Omit Frame Header", but I can't tell if it's damaging HIG or other requirements. When I asked some Japanese users about their opinions, they all felt that the notebook layout would make it less convenient to use, but there were also voices that supported respect for HIGH, and I felt the mood of giving up. Unfortunately so far, my claim for reverting does not seem to have gained clear support. Given the above, I would like to withdraw my claim for reverting in this issue. The discussion of layout improvement will take a considerable amount of time. Please revert to the original request (Expected Results:) of this issue to improve the usability of the notebook layout, which is unlikely to be reverted to the previous layout for the time being. I don't have clear opinion now if Heiko's suggestion in Comment 3 is better or not. I would like to expect the opinions of others. Only one point. In the notebook layout, I would like to be assigned the same accelerator key for the Asian "Features ..." button in the en-US locale as Western/CTL. The current implementation of 7.4.0.0a0 seems to differ only in Asian. Regarding the layout of the "Font" tab page, I would like to participate in the discussion of improvement if the momentum seems to increase in the future while watching the release of 7.4 or latter. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
