https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144563

Justin L <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
                 CC|                            |[email protected],
                   |                            |[email protected]
           Keywords|                            |bibisected, bisected,
                   |                            |regression

--- Comment #4 from Justin L <[email protected]> ---
When using a .DOC file, I bisected this to 7.1.0, 7.0.0.1, 6.4.5
commit 7e605bc3ff0cfea76be4683f0170d821fcae7203
Author: Vasily Melenchuk on Tue May 19 10:24:35 2020 +0300
    tdf#120394: doc import: use list format string

    Since introducion of list level format string there is
    no need in complex parsing of doc level string and convering
    it to prefix-number-suffix format. We can just replace there
    special chars by %n placeholders (used in docx and now in LO)
    and this should be enough.

When using an .ODT format, I bisected this to 7.3, 7.2
commit 9987b518fca1476bd0ce8c86bcf6ac7c81f7b580
Author: Vasily Melenchuk on Mon Jun 14 14:27:56 2021 +0300
    new ODF numbered list parameter loext:num-list-format

    Instead of style:num-prefix and style:num-suffix new list format
    is much more flexible for storing list multilevel numberings.
    Now it is possible to have not just prefix/suffix but any random
    separators between levels, arbitrary levels order, etc.

    Internal LO format for list format is changed: instead of placeholders
    like %1, %2, etc we right now use %1%, %2%... Reason: for ODT documents,
    having more than 9 levels there is ambiguity in "%10": it is "%1"
    followed by "0" suffix, or "%10"?

    Aux changes:
    * removed zero width space hack: since format string is always defined
      this hack is interfering with standard list numbers printing
      (see changes in ooxmlexport14.cxx, ww8export3.cxx tests)
    * changed cross-references values to lists: they are now including full
      list label string: previously this was bit self-contradictory (see
      changes in odfexport.cxx and check_cross_references.py tests)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to