https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147909
Alex Kempshall <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #178782|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #4 from Alex Kempshall <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 178801 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=178801&action=edit Using SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=qt5 results in much smaller dialogs The attachments should refer to what I obesered when exporting qt5 or gtk3 using SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN. I've removed the attachment with KDE5 in the name as it was unhelpful as explained by Robert. I've added the qt5 png which hopefully demonstrates the problem I'm seeing My tests are 1. Start a terminal session 2. export SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=gtk3. 3. Start LO 4. >From the menu bar Tools -> Options 5. Observe the size of the Options dialog 6. Stop LO 7. export SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=qt5. 8. Start LO 9. >From the menu bar Tools -> Options 10. Observe the size of the Options dialog 11. Stop LO When comparing the sizes of the Options dialog I'm finding that the options dialog when using SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=qt5 is about half the size of the options dialog when using SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=gtk3. The end result is that some of the details in the Options dialog when using qt5 are very difficult to read. Another example is 1. Start a terminal session 2. export SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=gtk3; libreoffice --writer 3. >From the menu bar Help -> Show tip of the day 4. Observe the size of the tip dialog 5. Stop LO 6. export SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=qt5; libreoffice --writer 7. >From the menu bar Help -> Show tip of the day 8. Observe the size of the tip dialog 9. Stop LO When comparing the sizes of the Tips dialog I'm finding that the Tips dialog when using SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=qt5 is about half the size of the Tips dialog when using SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=gtk3. The end result is that the details in the Tips dialog when using qt5 are very difficult to read. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
