https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147528
--- Comment #7 from Bella vGFH <brb.r...@tutanota.com> --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6) > (In reply to Bella vGFH from comment #4) > > [!!!] ACCEPT/ REJECT window comes up. Document owner *DOES NOT* ACCEPT OR > > REJECT ANYTHING BUT JUST HITS *CLOSE*. > > Merging documents is a different action than managing changes. Your comment > sounds as if you take this dialog as a confirmation for the merge operation. > > So the actual request is not a bug neither requires enhancement. It might be > a documentation gap. Do you agree, Bella? > > Laszlo, can we improve the situation at combining documents from comment 5? Hi Heiko, Sorry, not that much into nomenclature, just trying to get a job done ;) But yes, I do indeed see managing changes as something different than merging documents. Then again, I did notice, playing around with this, that merging documents can also mean "just gluing them together", which in my use case would lead to a multiplication of the same text. In addition, there is I mentioned earlier; if a reviewer takes a (later) version of one of the other reviewers who shared their comments earlier, the "just hit close" work around does not work. This means bottom line that: [] Yes, LO can combine the documents *with* their comments if all reviewers start/ work in the original document (original.odf) exclusively. [] However, if reviewers work in one of the later versions, adding their changes/ comments to a later version of one of the other reviewers, then LO throws an error (and I have to resort to the COMBINE" function of MS Word). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
