https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148081

--- Comment #5 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #4)
> Why? Why shouldn't the email include the link that Bugzilla generates, when
> it sends the email?

Well, that's not how bugzilla email messgaes usually work, but if you can get
it to happen, then ok.


> Why? You have *link* in the build. At least with TDF builds and personal
> builds.

I meant that if you press the copy button you don't get the date. But it's true
that you can click the link in the dialog and check. It's just an inconvenience
(plus, the commit "dates" are listed in relative terms). If I can get the calc
threading flag, I don't see why I can't have the head commit date.

> since they may be from different branches

But when that's the case, isn't that indicated in the version string?

> and what's important is if they include something in their history or not - 
> which is only possible to see if you use git tools, available when you follow 
> the links (you can see the commit history there).

That's more important for developers, but less for QA monkeys like us, who, if
we have a non-release build at all, it's a daily.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to